"Most great stories of adventure, from The Hobbit to The Seven Pillars of Wisdom come furnished with a map. That's because every story of adventure is in part the story of a landscape, of the interrelationship between human beings (or Hobbits, as the case may be) and topography. Every adventure story is conceivable only with reference to a particular set of geographical features that in each case sets the course, literally, of the tale."-Michael Chabon

Monday, March 7, 2011

March 8

Smoky the Bear Sutra by Gary Snyder

“Wrathful but calm. Austere but Comic. Smokey the Bear will Illuminate those who would help him; but for those who would hinder or slander him...
HE WILL PUT THEM OUT.”-Gary Snyder



Opening Journal:
1-What is your initial reaction to Gary
Synder? (Do you like him? Hate him? Think he’s silly?)
2-How is he different from other poets we have read? (Mary Oliver, Patricia Smith) How could the differences in his style convey differences in his intention of audience?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mH-0WLiNLQM

Group 1: Who is the author/speaker?
How does he or she establish ethos (personal credibility)?
Does he/she come across as knowledgeable? Fair?
What is his/her intention in speaking? To attack or defend? To exhort or dissuade from certain action? To praise or blame? To teach, to delight, or to persuade?

Group 2: What is the form in which it is conveyed?
What is the structure of the communication; how is it arranged?
What kind of style and tone is used and for what purpose?

Group 3: How do form and content correspond?
Does the form complement the content?
What effect could the form have, and does this aid or hinder the author's intention?

Homework:

from Having Faith, by Sandra Steingraber p. 929,

Sunday, March 6, 2011

Extra Credit

I have never before offered extra credit. However last class period's discussion prompted some interesting questions about food, pesticides, and conventional agriculture. These things are all huge issues and because I teach English and not food science, I feel unqualified to comment on them and self conscious about offering information or input that some of you may consider political.

When I was in college and I wanted more information about a controversial issue I often turned to a television/radio show called "Intelligence Squared"--a traditional Oxford-style debate, with one side proposing and the other side opposing a sharply-framed motion. As a college student, I found hearing the best arguments from both sides helped me attain more information and oftentimes come to an informed conclusion. Because I think both knowing about an issue and understanding the argumentative rhetoric used to support or defend a statement is important I'm offering the following extra credit option:

If you:

1-Watch the Intelligence Squared debate on organic food (it's a little over an hour and a half long) (http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/past-debates/organic-food-is-marketing-hype)
2-Write a one page (typed) response which details whose argument you found compelling and analyzes why that argument worked on a rhetorical level (Review your rhetorical devices handout and use that to help you in your short analysis of the debater's language: Did he or she use ethos, logos, pathos? How did he or she use rhetoric to appeal to the audience and to you?)
3-Present your paper to the class next Tuesday

and I will give you half a grade boost on your last paper (i.e. if you got a B on your last paper I will move your paper grade to a B+.)

Again, here's the link to the show: http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/past-debates/organic-food-is-marketing-hype

Please let me know if you plan on doing this assignment so I can plan class time for presentations. Good luck--let me know if you have any questions.

All best,

Rachael

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

March 3

Silent Spring by Rachel Carson

Rachel Carson:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/films/earthdays/player/

Imagine you are reading this in 1962. John Glenn has recently become the first American to orbit Earth. The U.S is in the middle of the Cuban Missile Crisis. John Paul XXIII has just opened the Second Vatican Council.
1-How do you imagine Americans responding to her work in the midst of this period of scientific, theological, and political expansion?
2-What rhetorical strategies do you notice Carson using to appeal to her audience?
3-Pick out a passage that you found significant to the time period and explain why you see it as contextually relevant.

Homework:
"Smokey the Bear Sutra,” by Gary Snyder, p. 473 (Journal)

Monday, February 28, 2011

March 1

“The world, we are told, was made especially for men—a presumption not at all supported by facts.”-John Muir



Opening Journal:
1-Pick a passage from John Muir’s writing.
2-How does that passage characterize “place” and the American environment?
3-What rhetorical strategies does he employ to create this characterization?

Video excerpts from PBS National Parks: America’s Best Idea:
http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/people/historical/muir/

In Groups:
1-What distinguishes John Muir’s writing from other writers you’ve experienced so far this semester?
2-How does his style of writing reflect his spirituality?
3-What about his prose might have drawn Americans to the National Parks?

March 3: Thursday
from Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson, p. 366 (Journal)

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

February 24th

"If the national park is, as Lord Bryce suggested, the best idea America has ever had, wilderness preservation is the highest refinement of that idea."-Wallace Stegner


Image: Teddy Roosevelt and John Muir, two early champions of the parks, in Yosemite, 1903.

Image: In 1892, Buffalo Bill Cody (second from right) and company survey the land at Grand Canyon National Park, 1892


Image: Photographer Ansel Adams at work at Denali National Park.


-Teddy Roosevelt video (from PBS America's Best Idea)

In Groups:

-What devices do you notice Roosevelt or Abbey using? (Pick at least 3 with a partner)

-Take fifteen minutes and try and make your own social or environmental argument using some of Roosevelt/or Abbey's strategies.

Homework: From A Thousand-Mile Walk to the Gulf, p. 85, and from My First
Summer in the Sierras, p. 98, by John Muir.
(Journal on one)

Rhetorical Analysis

Assignment 2: Rhetorical Analysis
Rough Draft Due March 22
Final Draft Due March 29th

While the term "rhetorical analysis" is, at first, rather intimidating for many people, it is easily understood (at least at its most basic) when broken down and defined.

Rhetoric: The art of persuasion
Analysis: The breaking down of something into its parts and interpreting how those parts fit together.

A rhetorical analysis examines how a text works—how its words, its structure, its ideas connect—or don't connect—with a given audience. For this assignment I want you to choose one of the readings you’ve encountered this semester and to break it down to its structural components. Rather than merely summarizing what the author is saying a rhetorical analysis analyzes how the author conveys his or her thesis through specific structural decisions.

Instead of a traditional rhetorical analysis you will be writing an imitation of a piece we’ve read in this class then writing a two page analysis of your imitation. You will need to include both your thesis and the thesis of the original work. You will need to write about which of the author’s strategies you employed to imitate their writing style and you will need to exhibit an understanding of how those strategies furthered both your thesis and the thesis of the original text.

Directions:
-Choose a reading that you’ve enjoyed in this course
-Examine that reading closely. What is the author’s thesis? How does he or she make his or her argument stylistically? How does the essay/poem/story’s structure reflect its purpose?
-Write your own creative piece integrating rhetorical strategies you notice the original author using to convey your own ideas about home, place, or the environment.
- Your imitation does not need to relate to the content to the original piece (but you do need to use a similar writing style)
-Write a short (2 page) paper which includes both your thesis (purpose) and the thesis (purpose) of the original text, analyzing how both you and the original author used the same rhetorical strategies to convey your ideas

Evaluation Criteria:

Your imitation should:
-Effectively uses at least three rhetorical strategies (example: diction, imagery, symbolism, voice) from the original text
-Use the same form as the original text
-Echo the original text in tone and structure (I should be able to tell immediately which piece you’re imitating because of the stylistic similarities)
Your analysis paper should:
-Includes both original author’s claim/argument/thesis and your own claim/argument/thesis in the introduction of the paper (As we learned from our last unit, every text from a poster, to a film, to a poem has a thesis)
(Example: In "The Clan of the One Breasted Women" Terry Tempest Williams argues that the way we treat the environment, reflects our treatment of other people. In my essay,______, I argue___________.) -Forecast the content of your analysis paper in your introduction (This will function like a thesis for your paper)
(Example: Through our use of first person plural narration, symbolism, and surreal imagery, Terry Tempest Williams and I convey our separate ideas about environmental injustice using similar rhetoric. )
-Focuses on one rhetorical device per paragraph, analyzing how that device functions both your piece and the original author’s work
-Connects each rhetorical device/rhetorical strategy to both your thesis and the author’s thesis
-Exhibit an understanding of the more nuanced aspects of argument through your ability to connect the form and the content of both your imitation and the original text

Peer Response Questions (Keep for reference, by knowing what your peers will look for when they respond to your paper, you will better understand what I am looking for in your analysis paper):

For the analysis paper:

Introduction:
-Highlight/label the thesis of the writer’s (your classmate’s) poem/essay
-Highlight/label the thesis of the author’s poem/essay
-Highlight/label the forecasting thesis of the paper
-Does the introduction clearly include all THREE of these things?

The body:
-Does the writer (your classmate) organize all their paragraphs around the one specific rhetorical device? (Label the focus of each paragraph)
-Does the writer (your classmate) connect each device back to the thesis (theses) of both texts? If not, how could they form these connections?
-Does the author focus on HOW both poems are written? (Label places where the writer could delve deeper into form/structure of both pieces)
-Does the writer (your classmate) connect form and content? (If not how could they?)
-Circle examples of passive voice (is, was…). What verbs could the writer (your classmate) use instead?
-Circle any places where the writer (your classmate) is summarizing and not analyzing--suggest ways the writer could make the writing analysis rather than summary.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Note:
While puzzling over how to articulate the difference between an "A" and a "B" paper I remembered a handout one of my instructors uses in both her graduate and undergraduate classes. In this handout she outlines many of the small differences between an average paper and an excellent paper. I remember finding it very helpful so I asked her for a copy. In it she refers to writing about Shakespeare and using quotes--you don't need quotations (necessarily) in this paper and you're not writing about Shakespeare but I think a lot of the information is still applicable--particularly if you're striving for an "A" level paper.

"A" level papers will treat your visual examples as Professor Shenk suggests you use quotes: by providing a visual example then spending several sentences analyzing its significance before going onto the next visual example. They will use a clear argumentative title, a decisive thesis, and a thorough analysis of each example used, and they will use clear concise language, linguistic keywords, and varied sentence structure. "A" level papers will not use a string of unanalyzed examples, summarize, use "to-be" verbs and passive language, use second person or informal language, or make grammatical mistakes.

This may not be applicable to all of you--"A"s are difficult to come by in college courses and many of you may be striving to simply write a competent paper rather than an excellent one. However, those of you striving for a "B+" or above may want to check out Professor Shenk's very helpful list of paper writing tips.

All the best,

Rachael


Linda Shenk’s Helpful Hints to Writing about Shakespeare

Because writing good papers involves a few techniques that often are not difficult to execute and yet make a world of difference, I have provided the following helpful hints.

Showing off your analysis



1. Make a good first impression with a good title: The title is the first aspect of your paper that the reader encounters, so make a good first impression. Although your title might be witty or creative, above all, it should be specific about what exactly your analysis reveals.
Lifeless, overly general titles:
An Analysis of Katherine and Petruchio’s Shared Language in The Taming of the Shrew An Analysis of Iago in Othello
Informative, specific titles:
“I am your own forever”: Iago as Othello’s Obedient Spouse
“So may you lose your arms”: Katherine and Petruchio’s Shared Language of Violence
As I did for the second set of titles, you might want to incorporate a striking phrase from the text itself (one that is particularly important in your argument), OR you could echo a line from the text but reshape it to indicate your own interpretation. In all titles, make sure you include the name of the character(s) you are analyzing. Note: Only the quoted part of the title goes in quotation marks. Do not put the title of your own paper in quotation marks.

2. Have an identifiable thesis statement at the end of a one-paragraph introduction: At the end of your introductory paragraph, provide a thesis statement that explains what your attention to the language brings to light—an idea that should more be complex than what you thought about your character(s)/topic before you started working on the paper. Also, think about how your introductory paragraph overall lays out all the keywords of your topic so that, by the time you get to your thesis, you have already introduced the key ideas that you will examine in your essay. If you have trouble writing good introductions & thesis statements, make yourself write a conclusion for your first draft. This paragraph often contains many perfect keywords/phrases as well as a far better statement of your argument. Cut and paste.

3. Do NOT include “life lessons” or “scholars have often interpreted” in your introduction or conclusion: You may find it tempting to begin or conclude a paper with statements about how one of Shakespeare’s plays demonstrates some eternal truth (i.e. we are all searching for our identity or reasons for existence) or how your idea differs from notions scholars have long used to interpret the work. Avoid such generalizations because, for the first technique, these ideas never do justice to the complexity of your observations, and for the second technique, you would need to include research to prove your claim. Get right to your specific argument in the paper’s first sentence—that swift specificity is most impressive.

4. Provide a BRIEF quotation in each paragraph: The passage does “double duty”: it provides tangible support that your ideas are indeed evident in the text, and it shows off that you are a careful reader who notices detail. Keep the quote to about one sentence or 1-3 verse-lines in length. By providing brief quotes, you include only what is the most important language for your reader, which keeps the focus tight and does not allow the quote to take too much “air time” away from your own commentary.

5. Speak your own language by using keywords: One of the simplest ways to show that all your ideas work well together is if you devise keywords and phrases for your topic and then use these words lightly throughout your paper, particularly in your title, your introduction, the first few sentences of each paragraph, and your conclusion. As you read over your first draft, look for words/phrases that nicely encapsulate your point. Then graft those words (and sometimes synonyms to avoid being too repetitive) back into the places I mention in this suggestion.

*6*. The secret to successful papers is consistent, well-structured paragraphs that provide an abundance of your own COMMENTARY. Although it seems formulaic, follow this sequence in every paragraph of analysis:
1.) Provide an opening sentence that shows how the idea of the previous paragraph is related to the idea you will discuss in this new paragraph. Hint: Use an introductory phrase that summarizes the previous paragraph’s topic, and then have the main part of the sentence introduce the idea for the new paragraph. Examples of beginnings to introductory phrases: Just as, Because, Although, Even though, When, After, In addition to, etc.).
2.) Include a second sentence that describes the topic that underlies the specific idea your quote will demonstrate. For this sentence (or the previous one), use some of the keywords from your thesis.
3.) Provide a brief quote (usually a sentence long, not just one or two words).
4.) In several subsequent sentences, explain how the passage is significant by referring directly to at least two specific words and ideas in that quote—ideally ones that work together to emphasize your point. By providing a passage from the text, you indicate that those exact words are important; therefore, use your commentary to show just how important they truly are. Think about explaining the significance of what you have noticed to the point that you think you are stating the obvious. By providing full commentary, you are not treating your readers as dim-witted, you are simply doing all the thinking-work for them. This last step of explanation separates an outstanding analysis from an average one. You would be amazed at how many academic papers and job-related documents falter because the writers left the importance of their ideas implied rather than stated outright.

7. Keep your commentary focused on the literal meaning of the words. Many people have the misconception that literary scholars seek to expose the “hidden meaning” of a text. Indeed, good scholarship does reveal interpretations that have gone hitherto unnoticed because, for example, the traditions or historical context may have been insufficiently considered in the past. Once we know these traditions or this context, however, it becomes clear that this meaning is evident all along. For your work in this class, focus firstly on the literal meaning of the words before you move on to any other meaning. What you should avoid is taking some metaphor or minute reference and trying to make a case that the whole play should be read through the lens of that one detail or abstract idea. I am most impressed by a careful reader who notices how larger ideas and patterns operate on the smaller level of individual moments in the text.

8. Do not begin or end a paragraph with a quotation: If you introduce and explain each quote, then you will never begin or end a paragraph with a quotation. By framing each passage with your own explanation, you are providing the interpretation and significance of each quote. Just like the person who has most powerful position in a discussion, you always get the first and the last word.

9. Do not paraphrase or provide plot summary: Write for readers who have read the play already and who understand the basic meaning of the lines.

10. No need to compliment Shakespeare: Do not dilute your work by saying that Shakespeare did a good job writing some aspect of the play or used such vivid imagery that readers can picture the scene or its characters in their minds. These comments are too general and never lead to sophisticated analyses.

11. Avoid describing the characters as if they are real people: Although you can describe characteristics of personality and relationship, do not hypothesize about a character’s inner feelings. To this end, eliminate such phrases as “truly feel/believe,” and every so often, make Shakespeare the subject of the sentence (i.e. Shakespeare creates/depicts) to acknowledge that he has created the figures you discuss.

12. If you incorporate material from secondary sources (i.e. research), see me to go over documentation.

13. Proofread your essays: To catch mistakes, read your papers sentence-by-sentence backwards.
Small items that add that last layer of polish to a formal paper
1. Handling titles: Italicize the titles of plays: The Merchant of Venice, Hamlet.
Remember: Do NOT underline the title of your own paper, or enclose it in quotation marks.

2. Providing citations for each quote: Give the act, scene, and line number(s) in parentheses after each quote. If the quote is less than four lines of verse, do not indent the quote but use a slash to indicate when each line ends. (Prose has not set form; therefore, you do not put slashes in prose quotations.) Notice, also, that the period goes after the citation. The only pieces of punctuation that you include at the end of a quote are a question mark and an exclamation point—omit commas, periods, and semi-colons.
“Fair is foul, and foul is fair. / Hover through the fog and filthy air” (1.1.11-12).
If you quote more than four lines of verse (or more than 28 words in prose), then indent the quote, and do not use quotation marks. Notice that, for a quote in verse, the lines appear as they do in the text.
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time,
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. (5.5.19-23)

3. Quotation marks around quoted words: When you refer to words from a quoted passage in your commentary, put those quoted words in double quotation marks (“).

4. Informal language: Although wit and humor are encouraged in class, maintain a formal and scholarly tone in your written assignments. Avoid conversational language, clichés, and contractions (can’t/won’t/shouldn’t) because they are not formal.

5. You/I/Me/We/Us: Do not use the second person (you, yours) in your paper because readers tend not to appreciate it when a writer tells them what they should do or think. I also suggest that you use the first person (I, me, my, mine; we, us, our, ours) sparingly, except in your final paper when you describe your creative choices. In this last paper, using the first person is most appropriate!

6. To be: As often as you can, avoid using the verb “to be” as your main verb. (Forms of “to be” often act as auxiliary verbs for certain tenses, so these instances are appropriate. Ex. “I was running.”) As a main verb, “to be” does not indicate any action or progression but rather sits in your sentences like an “=” sign.
In keeping with this ideas, avoid these lifeless constructions: There is/ It is/ That is.

7. The “lonely” this: Do not use the word “this” by itself. Always use it to modify a noun.
Unclear: This ensures that your reader understands what you mean.
Clear: This rule ensures that your reader understands what you mean.

8. Ellipses: DO NOT INSERT ELLIPSES AT THE BEGINNING OR END OF YOUR QUOTATIONS UNLESS ELLIPSES APPEAR IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT. You do use ellipses if you are eliminating any section out of the middle of a passage. Type ellipses as three periods.

9. Vary your sentence structure: If you begin some of your sentences with introductory phrases (Just as…, Although…, Because…, While…) rather than always with the subject, your sentences will have a lovely varied rhythm. As a result, your prose will sound like music rather than replicate the rhythm of Chinese water torture. I am serious. You would be stunned what a difference varying sentence structure does not only to the sound of one’s prose but also to the emphasis on how ideas connect.